AgfaPhoto Memory Solutions to Be Launched by Gamla at PMA 2010

AgfaAgfa memory cardsGamla Enterprises, a wholesaler for the photo-imaging industry, announced they will be launching AgfaPhoto-branded memory solutions in North America as part of a global expansion of AgfaPhoto’s products. The new memory cards and USB flash drives will debut at the PMA 2010 trade show in Anaheim, California, February 21-23, 2010.

Gamla, who secured the exclusive rights to market AgfaPhoto memory solutions in both North and South America, will offer 2GB, 4GB, 8GB and 16GB Secure Digital (SD) cards as well as 2GB, 4GB and 8GB microSD cards. AgfaPhoto microSD cards come packaged with a case and adapter, which allows consumers to use the same storage solution for microSD and SD devices.

Portable storage solutions include USB flash drives in 2GB, 4GB, 8GB and 16GB units for PC-to-PC data transfer. Each capacity has a different color band to indicate the memory size of the drive.

Consistent with AgfaPhoto’s new worldwide identity, its memory product line sports new packaging designed to capture consumers’ attention. Custom retail displays will also carry the updated design. The AgfaPhoto logo is highly recognizable and symbolic; the iconic red dot refers to the “sensor dot” that has symbolized innovative Agfa technology since the sixties.

“We at Gamla are very excited to be part of the renaissance of the AgfaPhoto brand name,” said Keith Gross, director of Sales. “AgfaPhoto is a trusted brand known the world over as a leader in photographic innovation.

“Consumer demand for USB and memory cards have seen dramatic growth in the past few years,” added Gross. “AgfaPhoto memory solutions, with their high level of consumer brand awareness, will be uniquely positioned to capitalize on this exciting new area for retail growth.”

Agfa was the first manufacturer to introduce an electronic shutter release on its electronic cameras, which eliminated camera shake, one of many innovations in its 138-year history. Its red sensor dot logo is still well known today in the world of photography. gamlaphoto.com

HP Announces Zero Percent Financing Incentive Programs

HP Financial ServicesHP announced zero percent financing promotions designed to make it easy and affordable for small and midsize businesses to deploy HP technology to meet their needs.

Offered through HP Financial Services, the company’s asset management services and leasing subsidiary, the new promotions provide businesses the choice to either lease or own products. Businesses can choose the offer that best suits their needs to invest in new technology and maintain cash flow. This includes a 12-month lease with a $1 purchase option or a 36-month lease with fair market value purchase option.

Businesses in the United States and Canada can take advantage of both offers through April 30. In the U.S., businesses can finance between $1,500 and $150,000 worth of products from HP’s portfolio. Complete details for both offers are available at hp.com/go/totalfinancing.

CIPA Reports ’09 Camera Shipments, Expects Figure to Rise 3.8% in 2010

Camera Shipments RiseTsuyoshi Kikukawa, president of the Camera & Imaging Products Association (CIPA), announced CIPA’s positive 2010 forecasts for digital cameras and related goods, as well as the organization’s shipment totals for 2009.

In 2009, the cumulative total shipments of digital cameras, from January to December, reached 105.9 million units, exceeding the performance in 2007 for the third consecutive year, when shipments broke through the 100-million-unit mark for the first time since CIPA began compiling statistics.

However, this represents a year-on-year decrease of 11.6% compared to 2008, when shipments exceeded 119 million units. A breakdown by camera segments shows that although shipments of digital cameras with built-in lenses (compact cameras) reached 96 million units or a year-on year decrease of 12.8%, shipments of digital SLR cameras with interchangeable lenses (including Micro Four Thirds and other interchangeable-lens cameras) reached 9.9 million units, a year-on-year increase of 2.3%.

Additionally in 2009, shipments of interchangeable lenses for SLRs reached 16.1 million units, a year-on-year increase of 2.8%, “exhibiting solid growth in categories with higher added value,” asserted CIPA.

For 2010, CIPA’s forecast for cumulative total shipments of digital cameras is 109.9 million units, a strong year-on-year increase of 3.8%. Broken down by camera category, CIPA predicts shipments of digital cameras with built-in lenses and digital SLRs with interchangeable lenses will reach approximately 98.9 million (a year-on-year increase of 3.0%) and 11 million units (a year-on-year increase of 11.1%), respectively.

CIPA also notes it expects “conspicuous growth in categories such as digital SLR cameras with interchangeable lenses for markets outside Japan, with shipments of 9.9 million units, a year-on-year increase of 12.5%, anticipated.”
 
The total shipments of interchangeable lenses for SLRs will also continue to grow apace with the expanding DSLR market in 2010, with shipments of 17.9 million units predicted, a year-on-year increase of 11.2%.

Kodak’s 4Q Revenues Up 6%, Profits Show “Substantial Improvement”

Kodak ProfitsKodak reported fourth-quarter 2009 earnings from continuing operations of $430 million, or $1.36 per share, compared with a loss on the same basis of $914 million, or $3.40 per share, in the year-ago period. 4Q sales were $2.58 billion, a sequential increase of 45% from 3Q 2009 and a 6% increase from the year-ago quarter.

“Our momentum is returning and our strategy is paying off. During 2009, we generated significant traction with our key digital businesses, we achieved sustainable operational improvements across the company, our earnings improved substantially, and we ended the year with more than $2.0 billion in cash on our balance sheet,” said Antonio M. Perez, Kodak’s chairman and CEO.

In 4Q 2009, gross profit margin was 34.4% of sales, an increase from 20.4% in the year-ago period. Six percent of this increase was driven by productivity improvements and higher demand for digital plates and kiosk media, productivity gains for digital cameras and devices, consumer inkjet, electrophotographic printing and traditional photofinishing, and favorable foreign exchange. The balance was driven by nonrecurring intellectual property licensing agreements.

For Kodak’s Consumer Digital Imaging Group, 4Q sales were $1.21 billion, a 27% increase from the prior-year quarter. Earnings from operations for the segment were $380 million, compared with a loss of $41 million in the year-ago quarter. The year-over-year improvement was driven by a combination of higher nonrecurring intellectual property licensing revenue; improved profitability in consumer inkjet systems, including an 81% revenue increase in consumer inkjet printer hardware and ink; improved operating performance in Digital Capture & Devices and Retail Systems Solutions; and reduced SG&A expenses across the segment. Excluding the impact of nonrecurring intellectual property royalties, segment earnings improved by more than $100 million.

For the Film, Photofinishing and Entertainment Group, 4Q sales were $589 million, a 10% decline from the year-ago quarter—a decline rate the company said “was significantly reduced compared to the first three quarters of 2009.” Earnings from operations for the quarter were $53 million, compared with earnings of $39 million in 3Q 2009. The increase in earnings was driven by “significant operational improvements in traditional photofinishing, cost reductions across the segment, favorable foreign exchange and improvement in raw material costs, partially offset by industry-related volume declines in film capture, and negative price/mix.”

For full-year 2009, Kodak reported a continuing operations loss of $232 million, or $0.87 per share, compared to a loss of $727 million, or $2.58 per share, in 2008. Full-year revenue totaled $7.61 billion, a 19% decline from 2008. Full-year digital revenue totaled $5.35 billion, a 17% decline from 2008, and traditional revenue totaled $2.26 billion, a 24% decline. The company said these results “reflect the recession’s impact on demand, especially in the first half of 2009,” and it expects that customer demand for its digital products will continue to grow as the economy recovers.

“In the second half of 2009 we began to see some improvement in the economy, and that helped to highlight the true strength of our digital portfolio,” added Perez. “During 2009, we doubled the installed base for our consumer inkjet printers while maintaining our price premium. In the fourth quarter, we grew sales of commercial inkjet products, including a 33% increase in sales of our VL2000 printing system and enjoyed continued strong customer orders for our Prosper product line.

“We delivered positive cash performance before restructuring for the past two quarters and for all of 2009, and our cost structure is providing us with significant operating leverage as the economic recovery continues. We enter the new year with the most competitive digital portfolio ever, strong presence in key markets, and a significant amount of positive momentum. All of this positions us well for improved performance in 2010.”

OmegaSatter and Brandess-Kalt-Aetna (BKA) Announce Merger

OmegaSatter BKA MergerOmegaSatter and Brandess-Kalt-Aetna (BKA), both leading distributors to the photo industry, announced they are merging to form “one of the largest and most comprehensive distributors in the industry.”   

The new organization, named OmegaBrandess Distribution, will be headquartered in Hampstead, Maryland. According to company representatives, the many complementary product lines carried by OmegaSatter and BKA are part of the appeal of the merger. The new organization will provide a single source for a wide variety of imaging brands available, including Pelican Cases, Novatron Lighting, Kodak, Gary Fong, Cokin, Blue Crane Digital and many others.

“Each company brings strengths that together will be a benefit to our customers,” says Jeff Seidel, director of Sales and Service for OmegaSatter. “Our new company will make it easier for the photo specialty dealer to purchase many of its needs in a convenient and cost-saving way”

“The new organization will create the largest and strongest field sales force in the photo industry today, and photo retailers will reap the benefits,” added Michael Griffith, National Sales manager for BKA. “We expect to see a swift integration of the two companies in terms of product and order flow.”

The company sees order consolidation, better product availability and enhanced sales representation as among the benefits dealers will experience.

“We are very excited about the opportunity to incorporate the best of two long-standing, well-respected companies in the photo industry. The advantages this will provide dealers and suppliers are immeasurable,” said Barb Brandess, president of BKA.

“We are extremely pleased to be teaming up with BKA. Both companies have a long history in the photo industry and by joining together we will be able to offer both dealers and suppliers the combined strengths of both company’s sales teams and knowledgeable employees,” added Cindy Wesolowski, president of OmegaSatter and now president of the newly formed OmegaBrandess.

Rescue Me: 2009, the Year That Was

By Biz Fast Tracker Barry Tanenbaum

Brian NobleChris LydleBruce KleinMike Paschke
The operative word in the headline is “was.” Almost every dealer I talked with was glad to bid ’09 a not so fond adieu. And even though crossing from 2009 to 2010 has not much to do with marketing or sales and everything to do with record keeping and the symbolism of a line of demarcation, it seems that any line at all, symbolic or not, is enough. As one dealer said, “It’s a tough time to be in retail.”

What I was looking for was their perceptions of 2009 and maybe a few high points to take away from the days of ’09.

And without hesitation, the first dealer I called—Brian Noble, at Noble’s Camera in Cohasset, Massachusetts—found a high point. “We were forced to be more creative than ever before,” he said, “to offer more services. It’s a challenge, but it’s good because we’re tapping into the creative side. We’re not just producing a 4x6 print; we’re trying to come up with reasons why customers should buy more than that.”

It made for a better Christmas, he said, because of a better Christmas card selection and “more opportunities for different products, more creative products.”

He was equally quick to come up with the big negative of the year. “The biggest problem I see is manufacturers dropping prices. We’re dropping our prices left and right; it’s the same percentage margin, but I pay my rent with dollars, not margin.” These days he’s selling, for example, a 12 megapixel point and shoot with a five-power zoom, image stabilization and facial recognition for $150—“and it takes the same amount of time to sell it as it did when it was $400,” he said. The manufacturers’ pricing, based on “their need to sell tonnage,” is not helping.

Neither is, he added, “the manufacturers dropping prices another $20 at the last minute at Christmas. You don’t have to do that . . . people are either going to buy a camera or they’re not; a $20 bill isn’t going to make a difference.” Summing up he said, “We worked smarter, but it’s harder.”    

Bruce Klein, at Bernie’s Photo in Pittsburgh, said, “I’ll start with the positives because that’ll be a shorter list.” On the product front the bright spot was accessories, particularly chargers. “We started selling a lot more of them; people keep losing their chargers. We were up probably a couple of hundred percent for chargers over last year.” He added that sales of bags were up a little bit, but memory cards were “about the same because people can buy them just about anywhere.”

Then, a surprise: “Our black-and-white film business picked up, believe 
it or not.” Who’s buying? “Students who are taking classes. And students who’ve never used film and want to try it and see what it looks like; they want to experiment.”
On the negative side, people didn’t spend as much as he’d hoped they would. “We still have some merchandise on the shelves we’d anticipated moving through Christmas,” he said, “and now we’re hoping we have post-Christmas sales. Maybe somebody got the wrong item, so they’ll come in and buy, or pick up some accessories. People were a little more reserved this Christmas.”

And he suspects they’ll continue to be so. “They’re thinking about what their picture is going to be for the next year. They’re thinking, am I going to have a job? So the image they have in mind [of their future] reflects their purchasing decisions; they’re saving for next year, just in case.”

Cameras that did well for him? “Some of the higher end point and shoots. People wanted quality but didn’t want to carry around a heavy DSLR.”

Overall 2009 was a down year for the store, but Bruce Klein is still there, still standing. Not everyone else is: “As a matter of fact,” he said, “we’re one of the last camera specialty stores in western Pennsylvania.”

At Shutterbug Camera in Santa Rosa, California, Mike Paschke took a moment to think about the positives of 2009. “I think we managed to scale with the times really well, to cycle the way we needed to with inventories and manage them really well.”
He didn’t have any “really runaway items” but mentioned the Tamron 18–270mm lens did “surprisingly well for us the entire year.”

The year did feature a pleasant surprise—a strong month of October that saw them move high-end items. The month was “a big shining light,” but it happened without any special promotion, and he has no idea why it happened.

The year, he summed up, was “a matter of managing costs and inventories. We didn’t do what we did last year, but the bottom line is that we’re about the same.” But considering the tough going of 2009, managing to manage isn’t half bad.

Back at the beginning I said “almost every dealer” was glad 2009 was over. The exception was Chris Lydle at Chris’ Camera Center South in Aiken, South Carolina. Chris’ Camera was up a double-digit percentage over their previous best year. Chris Lydle attributes the rise to “making fewer mistakes than some of the other guys,” but quickly adds that there was a lot more to it: they increased their breadth of selection in camera brands and accessories; took maximum advantage of the PRO buying group; and increased promotions.

“We’re not the only ones who are feeling challenges,” he said. “The media are, too, and we were able to negotiate some really good media deals in return for making an ongoing commitment.” He also did more direct e-mail than ever, tying the effort into a better point of sale system that harvested a lot more e-mail addresses.

“We also offered more creative services, photos books, custom cards . . . custom everything, and we’ve done a huge amount with camera classes.”

On the accessory front they promoted and sold more lenses, flashes units and small studio flash systems.

His association with the PRO group went from limited membership to full membership, a move that allowed him to buy PRO brand products and get “better than average” deals on several major manufacturers’ items, plus access to the PRO forums for idea exchanges.

Lydle sees himself as perhaps rare, but not unique. “I’m not the only dealer who’s gone ahead this year,” he says, “but I don’t think there are a lot of us.”

Still, it’s nice to end on a positive note.

CES: The Best Argument for PMA 2010

By Biz Fast Tracker Jerry Grossman

You can call me a grizzly CES/PMA show veteran. Without revealing my age, my combined trips to both of these shows are nearing 25. And while CES and PMA have historically been very separate and distinct, the shift over the years in the imaging category to digital has annually raised the “why PMA?” questions.

Well, after traveling the halls of the Las Vegas Convention Center from January 7–10, now more than ever I can see why the Consumer Electronics Show should never and will never replace the PMA trade show and convention.
CES is a great, if not overwhelming, show, if you are into consumer electronics. It was brimming this year with 3D technology, phones, e-frames, laptops, audio systems and Lady Gaga. But make no mistake, CES is not an imaging show. Not only is it not an imaging show, it makes imaging seem like a stepchild forced to sit at the bridge table while the adults feast in the dining room.

Imaging is not the hero of CES. I would characterize it almost as an afterthought. Two specific experiences crystallized this for me.

First, as I approached the incredible Samsung booth at the 2010 CES, in search of their terrific new NX10 digital camera, I sauntered through the booth, admiring Samsung’s dizzying array of flat panels, frames, 3D technology, home electronics and “green” initiatives. I casually asked a Samsung employee where the digital cameras were. “Back over there, I think,” he said, pointing to the far right corner of the booth. As I made my way through the booth’s maze of onlookers, I was still in search of the NX10. “Try over there,” said the next Samsung employee. Still no cameras. After literally four tries (no joke), I finally found the digital camera area, encompassing roughly 10% of the Samsung booth. (By the way, the NX10 didn’t disappoint when I finally got to see it.)

The other experience was my review of the major keynote addresses delivered at the show: Steve Ballmer of Microsoft; Alan Mulally, CEO of Ford; Paul Otellini, Intel’s president; Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo, Nokia’s president and CEO; and Qualcomm’s Dr. Paul Jacobs—all important people in the CE industry. And each had nothing to say about imaging. Hmmmmm.

As an industry, we have created some of the most incredible technology, especially in the last 10 years. Digital imaging has gone from a hobby to the mainstream. The “family photographer” moniker no longer belongs to one person in the family. It belongs to the kids, teens, parents and grandparents. We have cameras that will refuse to take a picture unless everyone is smiling, and no one is blinking! We should be given the stage to beat our collective chests to the world. PMA does that.

So, what arguments am I hearing from some manufacturers for going to CES and thinking about leaving PMA in the dust?

“We can see everyone at CES.” Sure, most of the big-box teams attend CES, and manufacturers are likely to see them there. But what are they seeing about our industry—imaging products pushed into the corner of booths and major manufacturers residing in meeting rooms? Is this a good message for the power of imaging in the lives of people? Is a meeting what it’s all about?

“Attendance is down at PMA.” Sure, the last year was a tough one; attendance was down everywhere. But those who come to PMA in 2010 can witness a vibrant industry that stands on its own. They can see the best and brightest minds in our business. And they can show their support for our industry, and the photo dealers who commit 100% of their time and resources to the business of imaging.

“Why can’t they combine CES and PMA?” Why should they? So they can stick imaging into a corner? Will Kodak and Canon and Panasonic and Samsung all agree to take their booths apart, and reside all in one “Imaging” section of CES? Not in our lifetimes.

“Who’s coming to PMA anyway?” Besides dealers, how about key influencers, like the media? Or bloggers and analysts. Or entrepreneurs looking to make deals. Or software companies looking for new opportunities. How many stories about imaging products were produced by the major media during CES? Not too many, because the story at CES is not imaging. It never will be. Didn’t see anything about cameras on CNN, NBC, Fox or in USA Today or the New York Times. (And all of these outlets cover PMA).

Has the industry changed? Sure it has. I’ve seen and heard all about the paradigm shift, and I think the PMA organization has to relook at the show and adapt itself a bit more to reality. But once per year, the PMA show puts the imaging industry on the world stage. All eyes point to our industry, and it allows us to beat our chests and show off what we can do. Canon’s decision to not be a part of PMA 2010 is a curious one, and one which they might regret. (I hope to see them reconsider for 2011.)
This year Anaheim will be brimming with the likes of everyone else—Nikon, HP, Sony, Samsung, Panasonic, Fujifilm, Kodak, Olympus, Tamron and GE, along with hundreds of others. All will be supporting our industry, and the dealers and vendors who make it happen.

So please, enough of CES overtaking the PMA show. There’s good reason for both and an incredibly important reason for PMA to continue as the cornerstone show of our industry.

Taopix Kicks Off 2010 with Surge of Photo Book Software Orders

TaopixPhoto book software developer Taopix has started 2010 by signing more than 20 new licenses for its photo book software in the last four weeks. The orders, which have come from digital print companies and Photo Labs in all of Taopix’s key international markets, signals the beginning of what Taopix’s CEO James Gray believes will be a great year for the photo book industry.

“Up until December 2009, Taopix had just under 100 photo book installations worldwide,” said Gray. “So to then secure a fifth of that number in just over four weeks is quite a milestone for the company. For me, it demonstrates photo books are really coming of age; the industry is now acutely aware of the huge impact great photo book software can have on a company’s product portfolio and profit margins. Equally, it also shows the strength of Taopix as a product and the service proposition we have built around it.”

Gray added that the orders have come from across the board—those entering the photo book market for the first time and those moving from other photo book solutions to Taopix.

The 20 new licenses kick off a busy year for Taopix, which will see the company also very active on the exhibition circuit. In February, it will be attending the HP Indigo user group conference, Dscoop, in Dallas, Texas, followed by the PMA 2010 in Anaheim, California, and IPEX 2010 in Birmingham, United Kingdom, in May.

Amazon & Walmart Beginning to Eat Into Best Buy’s Shares: Retrevo

Amazon Walmart Best BuyAfter Circuit City closed in early 2009, consumer electronics retailers large and small have been trying to grab some of that company’s market share. Now, according to an article in CEPro, “All that biting has taken a toll on U.S. No. 1 electronics retailer Best Buy,” based on a recent survey by Retrevo.

While CE giant Best Buy posted 13% overall growth and 8.2% comparable store sales increases for the fiscal month of December ended January 2, 2010, Retrevo’s survey reveals a change in consumer perception “that threatens to shrink Best Buy’s market share.” And it’s Amazon and Walmart that might reap the benefits.

Retrevo asked consumers which retailer—Best Buy, Amazon or Walmart—comes to mind first when it came to buying electronics during the 2009 holiday season and Best Buy’s lead of 40% was down 4% from the previous year. Amazon, however, grew 4% and Walmart dropped a point despite aggressive efforts to promote its electronics department, particular during the 2009 holiday season.

Other survey findings include:

—Just 25% of respondents said Best Buy had the lowest prices on electronics during the 2009 holiday season. Walmart led with 42%.

—When asked, “Who, among these resellers, did you think had the best selection of electronics this holiday season?” given the choice between Best Buy, Walmart and Amazon, 44% of the respondents said Best Buy. Amazon came in a close second with 41% followed by Walmart, which only received votes from 15% of those surveyed.

But Walmart’s efforts to build and promote its electronics did get some positive feedback, according to Retrevo’s study. “Looking at where consumers said they bought electronics during the 2009 holiday season compared with the 2008 season, Walmart picked up four points of market share (actual products purchased) in both the under-$200 and over-$200 electronics categories,” reported CEPro, adding, “Both Best Buy and Amazon lost share in 2009 versus 2008 holiday season.”

Kodak Alleges Digital Imaging Patent Infringement by Apple and RIM

Kodak Patent InfringementKodak filed lawsuits against Apple Inc. and Research In Motion Limited (RIM), alleging the infringement of Kodak digital imaging technology. The complaint, filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), specifically claims that Apple’s iPhone and RIM’s camera-enabled BlackBerry devices infringe a Kodak patent that covers technology related to a method for previewing images.

Separately, Kodak filed two suits against Apple in U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York that claim the infringement of patents related to digital cameras and certain computer processes.

“Kodak has a long history of digital imaging innovation and we have invested hundreds of millions of dollars creating our industry-leading patent portfolio,” said Laura G. Quatela, chief intellectual property officer, and vice president, Eastman Kodak. “In the case of Apple and RIM, we’ve had discussions for years with both companies in an attempt to resolve this issue amicably, and we have not been able to reach a satisfactory agreement. In light of that, we are taking this action to ensure that we protect the interests of our shareholders and the existing licensees of our technology. Our primary interest is not to disrupt the availability of any product but to obtain fair compensation for the use of our technology.”

Kodak has licensed digital imaging technology to approximately 30 companies, including such leading mobile-device companies as LG, Motorola, Nokia, Samsung and Sony Ericsson, all of which are royalty bearing to Kodak.